A Dow Theory buy signal, but…

Jack Schannep at DowTheory.com described a classic Dow Theory buy signal this way:

The classic Buy signal is developed as follows: After the low point of a primary downtrend in a Bear market is established, a secondary uptrend (this is the most often debated part of the Theory) bounce will occur. After that, a pullback on one of the averages must exceed 3%, according to Robert Rhea in his 1930’s The Dow Theory,  must then, ideally, hold above the prior lows on both the Industrial and the Transportation Averages. Finally, a breakout above the previous rally high by both, constitutes a BUY Signal for the developing Bull market.


The chart represents how the Dow Jones Industrial Average and the Transportation Average might look under the most usual BUY signal (B-1):



Both the Dow and the Transports made all-time highs last week, aided by a surge in the shares of Avis. The technical pattern is consistent with the description of a Dow Theory buy signal.



While the Dow Theory buy signal is bullish for stock prices, a number of key risks are lurking as I look forward to 2022.



Bullish confirmations

Let’s start with the good news. There are plenty of bullish confirmations. In the short term, Ryan Detrick pointed out that strong momentum, defined as the S&P 500 up 20% or more in the year, tends to resolve bullishly for November and December. While the same size is small (n=8), the remaining two months have been 100% positive.



The market is also exhibiting signs of strong breadth. A review of different Advance-Decline Lines shows that the S&P 500, NYSE, and S&P 400 A-D Lines have broken out to all-time highs. Only the NASDAQ and S&P 600 A-D Lines are lagging.



Broad equal-weighted market indices, such as the Value Line Geometric Index, have also achieved fresh highs.



I had written in the past that one of my bullish tripwires is an upside breakout of small-cap stocks out of their trading range. Both the Russell 2000 and S&P 600 broke out last week.



My other key bullish tripwire is an upside relative breakout by semiconductors. While these stocks have staged upside absolute breakouts, they only recently broke out of a relative trading range. This is a signal from a group of growth cyclicals that a global recovery is underway.



Sentiment readings are also supportive of further gains. The latest Investors Intelligence shows a recovery in the number of bulls, but my former Merrill Lynch colleague Fred Meissner pointed out that the number of bears also rose. I interpret this combination of skepticism in the face of strong momentum as the market climbing the proverbial Wall of Worry. This rally has room to run.



From a fundamental and macro perspective, the signs of a recovery are continuing. The Citigroup Economic Surprise Index, which measures whether economic releases are beating or missing expectations, is rising. In particular, the October Employment Report was a Goldilocks “not too hot, not too cold” report. Job gains were slightly ahead of expectations and the figures from previous months were revised upward. Moreover, gains in average hourly earnings were in line with expectations, which alleviated concerns about excessive wage inflation.



The Q3 earnings season has been solid. Both EPS and sales beat rates are above average and forward 12-month EPS revisions are rising. In addition to positive price momentum, positive EPS revisions are indications of fundamental momentum that is supportive of further gains.




Beware of 2022 headwinds

Here is the bad news. While I am slightly early to be writing about the outlook for 2022 in early November, the bad news is that market bulls won’t find next year’s stock market to be as easy.


Consider how quarterly estimate revisions have evolved in the last four years. Historically, analysts have been overly optimistic about their EPS estimates. Initial estimates tend to be high and they are gradually revised downward until the report date and that is why I have monitored forward 12-month estimates as a way of normalizing this effect. The pace of the pandemic recovery was a surprise to the Street, but the rate of upward quarterly revisions rose as the strength of the recovery became evident. The pace of upward revisions has decelerated for the last two quarters and revisions are likely to return to the more normal pattern of negative revisions for the Q4 earnings season. This development shouldn’t necessarily be interpreted as bearish, but the removal of a bullish tailwind for the EPS outlook.



The S&P 500 forward P/E ratio has been slowly falling in the past few months. P/E compression often occurs as the expansion matures from the initial rebound to mid-cycle. The challenge for equity bulls is the E in the P/E ratio has to rise faster than the decline in the P/E ratio.



The easy money has been made. The S&P 500 has returned to trend EPS growth. While this doesn’t mean that earnings can’t temporarily grow above trend, the recovery tailwind has dissipated.



Moreover, the relative performance of non-US markets is starting to raise warning flags. The accompanying chart depicts the relative performance of different regions compared to the MSCI All-Country World Index (ACWI). US stocks are leading the way (top panel). The major developed markets are going sideways (middle panel). The most disturbing development is the poor relative performance of emerging markets (bottom panel). Relative weakness in high-beta EM equities sets up a possible disappointment in the global economic recovery.




A late-cycle bull

In conclusion, I reiterate my view that the stock market is in a late-phase bull cycle, though that does not mean the economy is in the late-cycle phase of an expansion (see Where are we in the market cycle?). 


My base case scenario calls for a stock market rally into year-end led by reflation stocks. We are entering a period of positive seasonality and the market has been tracking the seasonal pattern relatively well in 2021. Expect a growth deceleration soon afterward, a rotation into growth, and a possible correction in Q1, but no bear market.


9 thoughts on “A Dow Theory buy signal, but…

  1. The perfect is the enemy of the good.

    The 80/20 rule has always worked well for me. If I’m able to capture 80% of the potential gains on a trade then I’m doing great. If I remain long 80% of the length of a bull market (presumably missing the first 10% and the last 10%) then I’m doing great. Given the challenges of trading, the percentages often devolve into 80% of 80% or ~65%->so I often look at 2/3 as a good target.

    The past week was interesting as I found myself contemplating trades in bond funds during much of each trading day. Because the impulse to buy was based solely on price action (as I had no theoretical basis for expecting bond yields would drop), I hesitated one too many times. In fact, I was stopped out of my first trades by the post-Fed reaction, which then reversed on Thursday. In fact, I’m still unconvinced – and my current bond holdings probably have a short shelf life. But then, the start of any extended move in the markets necessarily involves doubt and hesitation. Based on my own experiences this week, there is at least the possibility that bonds may make a run.

  2. The U.S, market is bright spot when many others are faltering. My factor and momentum is showing China is locked in a continuing classic bear market with the normal background of junk bond spreads blowing out, government austerity and economic growth slowing. Weakness in China is spilling out to the whole region from New Zealand to Singapore. Will it start to impact Europe and North America? The bear ends with one of my Factor Twists on the Chinese market and a falling junk debt index.

    China introduced a property tax on homes for the first time which is effecting home prices along with the mess of Evergrande and other real estate wounded companies disrupting home building. China is a huge consumer of industrial commodities for construction and I am seeing global mining stocks falter. The Baltic Dry shipping index has fallen 50% in the last few weeks. Dry shipping is for mineral ore, coal and grains not containers. Something big and negative is happening. Those commodity prices are also falling.

    The pandemic is breaking out in China and they have a phone app for Covid personal lockdowns that is red, green and yellow depending on your contact tracing and neighborhood situation. That flashing this way and that is effecting personal mobility and the economy. I’m avoiding mining because of all this. Falling metals prices could be good for some manufacturers. Will weakness spill into oil?

    1. While the Chinese property sector is indeed a source of worry, Chinese cuts on steel output due to the blue skies initiative for the Winter olympics (and maybe to lower energy consumption) should be considered as additional factors. And while we should respect the price action in Chinese markets, their services PMI held up relatively well.

    2. Ken
      I checked prices of XLB, JJC, Vanguard capital cycles, all of which are close to their highs. Is it time to bail out on these?
      EWC has made a new high, as discussed by you earlier in the year, also commodity dependent to a certain extent.
      Is it time to get out of material complex/commodity trades?

      1. To your point, BHP the grand daddy of them all has had material correction and is an exception to the rest of the complex. It is also yielding 11% dividend. Is it time to look at buying BHP?

  3. NEWS FLASH: Gold (GLD) and Gold Mining ETFs (GDX and GDXJ) are breaking out of hibernation. There was a Factor Twist at the recent low, a rally followed , then a pullback and now we are close to making a recovery high. Here is the chart of GDXJ the more aggressive ETF


    I sold out of these at the right time in the Fall of 2020 when they started to underperform massively since then. There is a possibility that they could go on an epic run up here. Central Bankers are printing money as if we are in an economic collapse when in fact things are booming. If Larry Summers says we are stimulating to much, then read that to say they are doing WAY, WAY too much.

    Next step, will be Brainard replacing Powell as the Fed Chair and four empty Fed seats filled with Dem appointments sending global investors into a tizzy.

    If GDXJ gets over the 45.47 recent high (now 44.75 up 3.4% on Friday), I would call that a breakout.

    Everything gold has frustrated and disappointed investors for a long time. It is so hated that anybody that wanted to sell is gone. Will it fail again? Only the bold will buy in again.

  4. Ken:

    On October 27 I recommended going long Gold and Gold stocks. The risk reward was great. Stop 1780 and objective 1900 minimum. So the ratio was 5:1. I am long.

Comments are closed.