Time to reconsider the equity bull case?

I highlighted a long-term buy signal in late July and early August when the monthly MACD of the NYSE Composite turned positive (see On the verge of a long-term buy signal and Trust (the bull), but verify (there’s no recession)). Historically, such buy signals have resolved in a bullish fashion with no bearish episodes and only normal equity-risk corrections.

 

The recent pullback has changed the MACD reading from positive to negative (circled). There were two other instances since 1995 when this has happened – in August 1999 and in May 2012. Both turned out to be false warnings and the stock market continued to rise soon afterward. Nevertheless, is it time to reconsider the equity bull case?

 

 

 

A question of breadth

A detailed analysis shows the reversal of the MACD buy signal can be attributed to poor breadth. The accompanying year-to-date performance of several market indices tells the story. While the S&P 500 advanced impressively for this year, the strength was mainly attributable to the megacap growth stocks in the index. By contrast, the equal-weighted S&P 500 and the broadly based NYSE Composite have gone nowhere for the year (as marked by the horizontal lines). Is it any wonder why the monthly MACD of the NYSE Composite reversed to negative in September?

 

 

The strength of the S&P 500 has meant that its monthly MACD is still positive. A study by Ryan Detrick of S&P 500 MACD crossovers showed strong returns over a one-year time horizon.
 

 

For the time being, I am inclined to give the bull case the benefit of the doubt.
 

 

Trend Asset Allocation Model still bullish

In addition, my Trend Asset Allocation Model is still showing a marginal bullish reading. As a reminder, the Trend Model is a composite model that applies trend-following principles to a variety of global equities and commodities. A model portfolio that uses the out-of-sample Trend Model signals to overweight or underweight the S&P 500 against a 60/40 benchmark has exhibited almost equity-like returns with balanced fund-like risk.
 

 

The most bullish component of the Trend Model is commodity prices, which are in an uptrend. The cyclically sensitive indicators are mixed. The copper/gold ratio has been trading sideways, but the more broadly based base metals/gold ratio has been slowly rising since June.
 

 

Turning to global equity markets, the S&P 500 has been weakening, but the index is holding above its 200 dma. Call that a neutral condition.
 

 

Across the Atlantic, European markets are mixed. The Euro STOXX 50 has violated both its 50 and 200 dma, but the FTSE 100 is weathering the correction and holding above its moving averages.
 

 

In Asia, it’s remarkable how well equity markets are holding up in light of widespread evidence of weakness in the Chinese economy. China and Hong Kong are weak, but the Japanese market is strong, while other Asian markets are mostly flat. Call it a neutral reading.
 

 

Putting it all together, the Trend Model interprets the combination of commodity strength and mixed equity market readings as a weak buy signal.

 

 

Addressing the bear case

Nevertheless, the latest bout of equity market weakness has fundamental roots. The surge in global bond yields has pressured equity valuation. As yields have risen, the equity risk premium has compressed.
 

 

Before you become overly bearish, consider that corporate insiders have started to buy this dip. Insider buys are exceeding sales. Similar past instances have signaled good buying opportunities.
 

 

As well, consider that large speculators are in a crowded short in Treasuries.

 

At the same time, a divergence is showing up between the Citigroup U.S. Economic Surprise Index and the 10-year yield. Historically, the two have been relatively correlated. The recent trend of decelerating positive surprises in U.S. economic data should put downward pressure on yields. I have no idea what data release may be the catalyst, but it could spark a bond and stock market rally of significant proportions.
 

 

An additional bearish factor that’s unsettling market psychology is the U.S. government shutdown. While the sample size is small, government shutdowns have tended not to last very long, and Jurrien Timmer at Fidelity found that even prolonged shutdowns have had little impact on stock prices in the past.
 

 

Ironically, a prolonged shutdown may have a calming effect on the Treasury market. The shutdown will delay the release of key economic statistics such as inflation and employment. The lack of data will induce paralysis at the Fed and increase the likelihood that it will stay on hold at the November FOMC meeting and possibly the December meeting as well.
 

Finally, the stock market is experiencing a severe technical wipeout, as measured by the percentage of S&P 500 stocks above their 50 dma that fell below 15%. Such episodes have always resolved in a short-term relief rally of varying magnitudes. In addition, its percentage of stocks above their 20 dma is exhibiting a positive divergence, which is another bullish sign.

 

I interpret this to mean that the latest episode of market weakness is only corrective and not the start of a major bear market. My analysis leads me to the conclusion that investment-oriented accounts should remain bullish on equities and give the bull case the benefit of the doubt.