Is the U.S. progress on inflation a case of two steps forward, one step back? Even before the stronger-than-expected September CPI report, bond prices were declining in the wake of the Fed’s jumbo half-point rate cut decision.
The Treasury market is exhibiting signs of anxiety from a technical analyst’s perspective. The 7–10-year Treasury ETF (IEF) has declined to test a key rising trend line. The long Treasury bond ETF (TLT) has already violated its trend line.
While the technical violations may only be temporary false breakdowns, these technical signals compel me to explore their asset return implications.
A Hot CPI report
Just when you thought that inflation was making good progress toward the Fed’s 2% target, the September CPI report came in higher than market expectations. Core CPI (blue bars) ticked up sequentially. Especially disappointing was the services CPI ex-rents print (red bars) that was unexpectedly strong.
After all, the
September FOMC minutes contained the crucial assumption that “almost all participants judged that recent monthly readings had been consistent with inflation returning sustainably to 2 percent” and “Almost all participants saw upside risks to the inflation outlook as having diminished, while downside risks to employment were seen as having increased”.
Eleven of 12 FOMC members support a half-point cut as they “generally observed that such a recalibration of the stance of monetary policy would begin to bring it into better alignment with recent indicators of inflation and the labor market”. The lone dissenter was Fed Governor Michelle Bowman, who favoured a quarter-point cut.
So much for the assumptions. Was the hot CPI print just a data blip? How does it affect the rate cut path as the Fed has become more data dependent?
Even as the Fed strives to be predictable and communicate its policy path, excessive data dependency will make for more volatility in interest rate expectations. In the wake of the CPI report, the
WSJ reported that Atlanta Fed President Raphael Bostic said in an interview, “This choppiness [in inflation data] to me is along the lines of maybe we should take a pause in November. I’m definitely open to that”. On the other hand,
Bloomberg reported that New York Fed President John Williams, Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee and Richmond Fed President Thomas Barkin dismissed the hot CPI print as a data blip.
Now that inflation has come in higher than expected, the debate is no longer recession or soft landing, but soft landing or an overheating economy. The 10-year Treasury yield is now well above 4%. Expect Treasury yield volatility to continue until the market is satisfied that inflation is sustainably on its way to 2%. Moreover, the recent hurricane-related supply chain disruptions will also make judgments about the U.S. economy more difficult and more volatile.
Equity market challenges
In other words, bond market investors will face greater near-term uncertainty. But what about stocks?
Long-run equity returns depend on two key factors: the evolution of earnings and the capitalization rate of those earnings, or the P/E ratio, which is dependent on competing Treasury rates.
The accompanying chart shows the 10 year record of the S&P 500 forward P/E ratio compared to the 10-year Treasury yield, which is inverted. That’s because higher yields lower P/E ratios and lower rates put upward pressure on P/E.
The S&P 500 is trading at a forward P/E of 22, which is elevated compared to its own history. However, an elevated Treasury yield of over 4% makes equity valuation challenging on a comparative basis.
Equally important is the evolution of earnings expectations. As we approach Q3 earnings season, forward 12-month EPS estimate growth has stalled. This makes stock prices vulnerable to wobbles should earnings reports disappoint.
In summary, equities will face the twin challenges of bond yield volatility and an ambiguous earnings outlook as investors enter Q3 earnings season. Expect some volatility ahead, which will be exacerbated by election uncertainty over fiscal, tax and trade policy.
Still bullish
Despite the near-term challenges, my base-case scenario calls for these hurdles to be resolved in a benign manner.
I set out the bond market hurdle as “the market is satisfied that inflation is sustainably on its way to 2%”. Most components of core CPI are decelerating, including the all-important shelter component. The upside surprise to CPI was mainly attributable to a single component, medical care expenses, which is an indication that the uptick isn’t broadly based.
In addition, the global trend in inflation surprises has been flat for the past year, except for China. This is a worldwide disinflationary trend that can’t be ignored.
For equities, the bottom-up earnings outlook appears somewhat uncertain, but the top-down outlook is upbeat.
The Atlanta Fed’s Q3 GDPNow stands at 3.2%, which is strong by historical standards.
The Citi Economic Surprise Index (ESI), which measures whether economic indicators are beating or missing expectations, recently turned positive after several months in negative territory, indicating positive economic momentum. This is a top-down signal of a positive growth surprise that should eventually translate into a bottom-up upside momentum in earnings estimates.
SentimenTrader observed that ESI turning positive tended to be bullish for stock prices over the coming year.
In conclusion, the bond and stock market face a number of near-term uncertainties. Volatility in economic data feeds through to bond market volatility because of the Fed’s increasing focus on data dependency. As well, wobbles in earnings estimate growth at the start of Q3 earnings season is leading to uncertainty in stock prices.
I believe these sources of volatility will resolve themselves in a benign manner. Disinflation is taking hold globally and the recent upside surprise in CPI is probably just a data blip. As well, top-down economic indicators are signaling positive growth surprises, which should eventually translate into renewed upside in earnings growth.