Let me preface my remarks with two caveats. Firstly, I am politically agnostic and I don`t have a horse in the latest race for the American presidency. As a Canadian, I can`t vote in a US election. As well, it might be considered foolhardy to project what a politician might do based on his campaign promises, particularly during primary season.
Nevertheless, as Donald Trump has strengthened in the Republican primaries and he has become a serious contender, it is time to consider what a Trump Administration might do (much in the spirit of my last post How to trade the Brexit referendum).
Trumponomics revealed
There are some clues on what a President Trump might do. CNN recently asked, So what exactly is Donald Trump’s economic policy? These are summarized below, with likely equity market effects:
- Massive tariffs on China and Mexico: Bearish, the former would kill the global supply chain and the latter would be difficult without abrogating NAFTA.
- Keep the minimum wage, but not increase it: Neutral, as it represents the status quo.
- For a wealth tax, but also big tax cuts: Bullish, see analysis below.
- Get Wall Street pros to run the economy: Bullish, at least in the short-term.
- Repeal Obamacare: Uncertain as details are unavailable.
I would add that not detailed is the CNN article is the stated desire to leave Social Security and Medicare unscathed. The WSJ also featured a recent article on the Trump tax plan, which detailed the massive tax cuts that he has proposed:
Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump unveiled an ambitious tax plan Monday that he says would eliminate income taxes for millions of households, lower the tax rate on all businesses to 15% and change tax treatment of companies’ overseas earnings.
Under the Trump plan, no federal income tax would be levied against individuals earning less than $25,000 and married couples earning less than $50,000. The Trump campaign estimates that would reduce taxes to zero for 31 million households that currently pay at least some income tax. The highest individual income-tax rate would be 25%, compared with the current 39.6% rate.
Many middle-income households would have a lower tax rate under Mr. Trump’s proposal, but because high-income households generally pay income tax at much higher rates, his proposed across-the-board rate cut could have a positive impact on them, too. For example, an analysis of Jeb Bush’s plan—taxing individuals’ incomes at no more than 28%—by the business-backed Tax Foundation found that the biggest percentage winners in after-tax income would be the top 1% of earners.
Mr. Trump’s plan appears designed to help him, as the GOP front-runner, cement his standing as a populist—though that message is complicated by the fact that the billionaire, like other Republican leaders, would eliminate the estate tax.
Trump would offset those tax revenue losses with the following revenue offsets:
To pay for the proposed tax benefits, the Trump plan would eliminate or reduce deductions and loopholes to high-income taxpayers, and would curb some deductions and other breaks for middle-class taxpayers by capping the level of individual deductions, a politically dicey proposition. Mr. Trump also would end the “carried interest” tax break, which allows many investment-fund managers to pay lower taxes on much of their compensation.
A significant revenue gain would come from a one-time tax on overseas profits that could encourage U.S. multinational corporations to return an estimated $2.1 trillion in cash now sitting offshore, largely to avoid U.S. taxes. His proposal would impose a mandatory 10% tax on all of that money, even if the money stays overseas, but allow a few years for the tax to be paid. The Trump campaign estimates that many companies would choose to bring their money back home, boosting jobs and investment in the U.S.
Mr. Trump also would impose an immediate tax on overseas earnings of American corporations; currently, such tax payments can be deferred. All told, the campaign says the plan would be revenue neutral—neither raising nor lowering federal revenues—by the third year and then begin adding revenue.
To summarize, the key points of the Trump tax plan are:
- Massive income tax cuts
- A flatter tax structure
- One-time tax break for corporate repatriation of overseas profits
Trump 2017 = China 2009?
The Trump plan would also blow an enormous hole in the budget deficit and debt outlook. The Fiscal Times summarized the fiscal effects of the Trump plan this way:
The nonpartisan Tax Policy Center has pegged the 10-year cost of Trump’s proposed tax cuts at $9.5 trillion — or $11.2 trillion if you add in interest on the debt that the tax cuts will generate. The nonpartisan Tax Foundation says that Trump’s tax plan would cost the Treasury revenues of $10 trillion over the same period, but they reached that conclusion by giving Trump credit for economic growth. Either way, Trump’s approach would send deficits and the long term accumulated debt through the roof.
Likely market reaction
Rather than recoil in horror at the spike in debt, let’s consider the likely market effects should such a plan get put into action:
- Income tax cuts: Bullish for consumer spending and the economy.
- Overseas corporate cash repatriation: Bullish for capital spending.
- Deteriorating national debt outlook: Bearish for USD, but bullish for commodities and US exporters which have faced earnings headwinds from a strong exchange rate.
- Rising tariffs: Bearish for stocks, but it depends on implementation.
Let’s be honest about this. No-one knows what Donald would do – least of all Donald. He has no experience at the democratic process, he is a business man that can act alone with out over site, no consensus building etc. Might work if we were a dictatorship but we are not – yet!
We have a vague idea. He seems to like spending…and he isn’t afraid of debt.
He`s a classic Keynesian.
Thanks Cam.
Even when Obama had a Democratic majority in both houses in the first two years, there were incredible problems in getting anything done. Trump will face the same bureaucractic paralysis and get mired down. I expect Trump or Bernie would find it impossible to enact their extreme policies.
I just hope that there is a God and that he/she/it is blessing America because it sure looks like we’re going to need all the help we can get 😉
My inner investor likes the Keynesian Trump, but my inner mensch despises Don Trumpusconi. (Or perhaps Vladimir Trump is a more fitting pejorative?)
it is amazing that the republican party has been totally whipsawed over the last few years from the grips of the tea party to that of a flamboyant, lying, bigoted business man….who wants to “blow a hole” int the deficit and debt outlook of our country.
Canada had Rob Ford, who would still be the Toronto mayor if he didn’t have his substance abuse problems.
America has Donald Trump.
Cam- Did you cover the SPXU position? I am having some challenges keeping up with your trading. Thank you!
Some of your projections ignore US economic history. Reagan and Kennedy both had big tax cuts that the OMB and other economic institutions warned would send US debt sky-high. In both instances growth increased so much more than expected that tax revenues actually increased rather than decreased. In the Kennedy case this meant no debt increase. In the Reagan case, deficits soared not because of decreased tax revenues (tax revenues actually rose), but because spending rose even more because of defense and other policies. Harding and Coolidge were also big tax cutters, and were told at the time that their tax cuts would slash government revenue. In both instances revenues went up and debts fell.
The key problem with such projections is STATIC analysis. In other words if you cut taxes and keep everything else the same, tax cuts always look like they will cut tax revenues and send debt through the roof. But the economy is not static. In fact the biggest and broadest tax cuts have accompanied the highest growth periods of the last century – and the much higher growth often leads to a Laffer Curve where revenues increase.
I don’t know why you didn’t compare the Trump tax agenda to that of Reagan, Kennedy, Harding, or Coolidge. Nor do I know why you buy the STATIC analysis projections that nearly always have proven wrong with regards to revenue changes once growth improves under big tax cuts.